You now know something most adults do not. The model is frozen. Your prompt does not change it. That is a precise technical fact, and precise facts are useful mainly because they let you take a fuzzy worry and find out which part of it is actually true.
Here is a fuzzy worry worth testing. Americans are increasingly uneasy about artificial intelligence. In a survey conducted in June 2026, 52 percent of U.S. adults said they were more concerned than excited about the growing use of AI in daily life, compared with 9 percent who said they were more excited than concerned (Pew Research Center, 2026b). That gap has widened over time. In 2021 the concerned share was 37 percent. The shift among younger Americans is sharper still: 55 percent of adults under 30 now report more concern than excitement, up from 39 percent only two years earlier (Pew Research Center, 2026b).
One specific worry shows up again and again inside that general unease, and it is a worry about data. Roughly seven in ten Americans predict that AI will make their personal information less secure, while just 3 percent expect it to make their information more secure (Pew Research Center, 2026a). Confidence in the institutions meant to manage this is low in both directions: 67 percent report little or no confidence in the federal government to regulate AI effectively, and about six in ten are not confident that the companies building these systems are developing them responsibly (Pew Research Center, 2026a).
Now put today’s lesson against that worry and sort it.
If the concern is that your words are being absorbed into the model, becoming part of what it knows, retrievable later by some stranger who asks the right question, then the concern is aimed at the wrong stage. Inference does not write anything back. The parameters were frozen before the file reached the server. Your sentence does not become a parameter. It cannot.
But notice how narrow that reassurance actually is. It says something about the numbers. It says nothing whatsoever about the trip your sentence took to reach them.
When you type into a cloud model, your text leaves your device. It crosses a network, arrives at a company’s servers, and is processed there. Along that path it can be logged. It can be stored. It can be retained under a policy you did not read, reviewed by an employee, handed over under a legal request, or collected into a pile of text that gets used months later as training material for an entirely different model, in a separate run, producing a separate frozen file. None of that is the model learning from you. All of it is your data going somewhere.
So the public concern is not wrong. It is misfiled. The risk lives in transmission and storage, not in the frozen numbers. And that distinction is not a technicality, because the two problems have completely different solutions. You cannot fix a data retention problem by asking a model to forget, since the model never remembered. You fix it by controlling where the text goes.
Which is exactly the choice built into this course. Two of the three models you will use next week run on a machine in Mr. Muggivan’s house, reached through a tunnel. Your prompt goes there and nowhere else, and it is not retained. The third model, Gemini, runs on Google’s servers, and your prompt makes the full trip. Same question, same moment, three answers, and one of the three took a fundamentally different path to get to you.
That is the comparison you will be running, and it is worth knowing in advance that most of the class will focus on which answer sounded best. Sounding best is the easiest thing to notice and the least informative thing to measure.
Return to the discrimination this course keeps circling. A claim can be true and still fail to answer the question in front of it. "The model does not learn from you" is true. If someone asks whether their conversations are private and you offer them that sentence, you have handed them something accurate that sits beside their question rather than answering it. Knowing the difference between the two is most of the skill.
Pew Research Center. (2026, June 17). Americans and AI 2026: Chatbots, smart devices and views on impact. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2026/06/17/americans-and-ai-2026-chatbots-smart-devices-and-views-on-impact/
Pew Research Center. (2026, August 18). Young adults in the U.S. are increasingly wary of AI, concerned it will take jobs. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/08/18/young-adults-in-the-us-are-increasingly-wary-of-ai-concerned-it-will-take-jobs/
The words, in plain terms
| Stage | What happens | How long | Do the numbers change? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pretraining | The model reads enormous amounts of text and guesses what comes next. Every wrong guess nudges the numbers. | Weeks to months | Yes. Constantly. This is where knowledge comes from. |
| Post-training | A smaller, targeted stage. Teaches the model to follow instructions, answer in full sentences, and refuse some requests. | Days to weeks | Yes, but far fewer of them, and aimed at behavior instead of knowledge. |
| Freezing | The numbers are written into a file and locked. The file gets copied to servers and to machines like the one in Mr. Muggivan’s house. | A moment | No. This is the moment it stops. |
| Inference | You type a prompt. It runs through the frozen numbers. An answer comes out. | Seconds | No. Not once. Not ever. |
Two things follow from the bottom two rows. The model has a knowledge cutoff, because the reading stopped on a date. The model is not learning from you, because the learning was over before the file reached the machine you are typing on.
The words, in plain terms
| Model | Total parameters | Active per token | File size at Q4 | Where it runs | Knowledge cutoff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 E4B | 8,000,000,000 | 4,500,000,000 effective | 6.33 GB | Mr. Muggivan’s rig | January 2025 |
| Gemma 4 26B-A4B | 26,000,000,000 | 4,000,000,000 | 18.2 GB | Mr. Muggivan’s rig | January 2025 |
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | Not published | Not published | Not published | Google’s servers | March 2026 |
These are the three models you will use on Monday. Two of them sit on a machine you could walk up to and touch. One of them does not.
The words, in plain terms
The words, in plain terms
- APeriod 1
- BPeriod 2
- CPeriod 4
- APretraining
- BInference
- CFreezing
- DPost-training
- APost-training
- BParameter
- CKnowledge cutoff
- DInference
- AYes, identical
- BNo, the model updated between periods
- COnly if they used the same station
- DThere is no way to tell
- AInference
- BFreezing
- CPretraining
- DPost-training
- AAn arrow that changes the numbers
- BThe prompt going in
- CThe answer coming out
- DThe knowledge cutoff
- ANothing; knowledge is the pattern across all of them
- BOne complete fact
- CThe model’s knowledge cutoff
- DWhich stage wrote it
The first item is your name. Answer it — that is what puts you on the work now that email collection is off.