Frozen Numbers, Moving Data

You now know something most adults do not. The model is frozen. Your prompt does not change it. That is a precise technical fact, and precise facts are useful mainly because they let you take a fuzzy worry and find out which part of it is actually true.

Here is a fuzzy worry worth testing. Americans are increasingly uneasy about artificial intelligence. In a survey conducted in June 2026, 52 percent of U.S. adults said they were more concerned than excited about the growing use of AI in daily life, compared with 9 percent who said they were more excited than concerned (Pew Research Center, 2026b). That gap has widened over time. In 2021 the concerned share was 37 percent. The shift among younger Americans is sharper still: 55 percent of adults under 30 now report more concern than excitement, up from 39 percent only two years earlier (Pew Research Center, 2026b).

One specific worry shows up again and again inside that general unease, and it is a worry about data. Roughly seven in ten Americans predict that AI will make their personal information less secure, while just 3 percent expect it to make their information more secure (Pew Research Center, 2026a). Confidence in the institutions meant to manage this is low in both directions: 67 percent report little or no confidence in the federal government to regulate AI effectively, and about six in ten are not confident that the companies building these systems are developing them responsibly (Pew Research Center, 2026a).

Now put today’s lesson against that worry and sort it.

If the concern is that your words are being absorbed into the model, becoming part of what it knows, retrievable later by some stranger who asks the right question, then the concern is aimed at the wrong stage. Inference does not write anything back. The parameters were frozen before the file reached the server. Your sentence does not become a parameter. It cannot.

But notice how narrow that reassurance actually is. It says something about the numbers. It says nothing whatsoever about the trip your sentence took to reach them.

When you type into a cloud model, your text leaves your device. It crosses a network, arrives at a company’s servers, and is processed there. Along that path it can be logged. It can be stored. It can be retained under a policy you did not read, reviewed by an employee, handed over under a legal request, or collected into a pile of text that gets used months later as training material for an entirely different model, in a separate run, producing a separate frozen file. None of that is the model learning from you. All of it is your data going somewhere.

So the public concern is not wrong. It is misfiled. The risk lives in transmission and storage, not in the frozen numbers. And that distinction is not a technicality, because the two problems have completely different solutions. You cannot fix a data retention problem by asking a model to forget, since the model never remembered. You fix it by controlling where the text goes.

Which is exactly the choice built into this course. Two of the three models you will use next week run on a machine in Mr. Muggivan’s house, reached through a tunnel. Your prompt goes there and nowhere else, and it is not retained. The third model, Gemini, runs on Google’s servers, and your prompt makes the full trip. Same question, same moment, three answers, and one of the three took a fundamentally different path to get to you.

That is the comparison you will be running, and it is worth knowing in advance that most of the class will focus on which answer sounded best. Sounding best is the easiest thing to notice and the least informative thing to measure.

Return to the discrimination this course keeps circling. A claim can be true and still fail to answer the question in front of it. "The model does not learn from you" is true. If someone asks whether their conversations are private and you offer them that sentence, you have handed them something accurate that sits beside their question rather than answering it. Knowing the difference between the two is most of the skill.

References

Pew Research Center. (2026, June 17). Americans and AI 2026: Chatbots, smart devices and views on impact. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2026/06/17/americans-and-ai-2026-chatbots-smart-devices-and-views-on-impact/

Pew Research Center. (2026, August 18). Young adults in the U.S. are increasingly wary of AI, concerned it will take jobs. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/08/18/young-adults-in-the-us-are-increasingly-wary-of-ai-concerned-it-will-take-jobs/

View

The first item is your name. Answer it — that is what puts you on the work now that email collection is off.

Exit ticket · on your own
Could This Class Run Its Own AI? · Day 5 of 7